These genes are the dominant faith, is more. Debated question now is: Is that this gene is a miracle of God, or evolution is developed as a result?
IMPORTANT NOTE: The Islamic perspective by looking at genes direct contact between the beliefs could be possible to accept the materialist perspective gözükmemektedir.Ama West and is the source of pozitivist-rationalist science came in the last point is an interesting news article was added to our website ...!
Emerged a sense of how faith? Thousands of years, mankind has the influence, has directed? American famous molecular biologist Dean Hamer, the answer to this question, people with physical properties of the DNA code called. At the end of the 6-year investigation in a number of "genes of faith in Allah" was found açıkladı.19/10/2004 Vatan newspaper

U.S. National Cancer Institute as assistant in Hamer in 1998, the genetic structure of people began to research the impact on the faith. Hamer, first, with the same genetic structure of "identical twins" made on the review. Then, the exact genetic structure that does not overlap, but "growing in the same environment" to compare the beliefs of his brother.

Same belief in the power of identical twins
According to research, siblings, grown in the same environment as if they could also have different beliefs. Hamer, however, identical twins with the same genetic structure of the Allah inancının almost "the same" is found. On top of this, a link between genes and beliefs are convinced that the research in this direction deepened.

Hamer, then, people from the 35 thousand genes which "affect the belief that" was trying to find. After years-long investigation, "monoamin" checked 9 enzymes are secreted and focused on genes.
Awareness and belief referring genes
American scientist, 9 gen's "most dominant" has found, as the research has come to the end. Hamer, VMAT2 "gene directs the belief by explaining the concept of this gene," Faith Geni "gave the name. Hamer'e, according monoamin enzyme, the human's" awareness, perception and memory, such as "sense of yönlendiriyor.Ancak, bilimadamının" Wide Faith "and the gene, to mankind, the actual distinguishing feature is the "personal and universal
awareness "capability also gives. So, man's" universe, eternity, God "is such as to reflect on abstract concepts.

Therefore, the same "genetic structure" has enzymes in identical twins, "and fully in control of the same gene
In the same way "it is secreted" belief structures "also oluyor.Dean Hamer'ın thesis, is not there, the belief in evolution is well. Hamer, explained this thesis:

"Genes do not work full faith is weak''
"People always more you want to live. Therefore, the best human genetic characteristics, (natural selection method) to the next generation will be transferred. İnanç Gen also good genetic features. It protects itself from being exalted to a people who believe, life is looking more positive and longer lives. people live longer, allowing for the 'good' as this genetic feature passed generation from generation, and over time the concept of faith has been placed. genin interaction with other genes and how much is dominant, the power of belief set. I mean, this gene is not fully functional person's belief is weak . Rather strong belief that if people are substantially strengthened.''

Has also been atheist or religious
'Faith of the gene has also brought with it discussion. Atheist that "this is a proof of God's not," he said. Dindar scientists the "fact of God to the human body that influence and power displays" defense did. Publishes research in Time magazine, the "faith gene" to have the science and religion in the world for centuries yaşanan, "God is there Did you believe, or trust Do you need God created? " debate has flared again. American biologist's "Faith found genes" description, such as bombs fell into the world of science and religion. Atheist the "belief gene" discovery "are not of God" was claiming to be a proof. Many scientists, however, opposed this view. For example, Virginia University's psychiatric expert lindo Eaves'ın comments about the issues as follows: "the concept of God in the brain that may be true shape. So why is this concept we should look at him? So why in the brain" trust "to deliver the chemical activity is experiencing? I think that the answer again God's strength lies ...
The most famous atheist: I'm no longer believe in God

Of the world's most prominent atheist (God knows) is a British professor Antony Flew, "Research has shown that the existence of life in art is an asset yüce" he announced to begin to believe in God.
Reading University philosophy professor Antony Flew retired from 50 years to defend the faith was wheel. Follows 81-year-old Flew says the reason: "I need to have a complex layout, and an incredible host for DNA research, the existence of life in art is a clever show that has assets." His 1950 "Theology and Deceit" in many languages 40 prints from his article Flew'in turn to God, so far that are affected by the ideas of atheistic environment has a great match reaction. From University College London biology professor Lewis Wolpert, "only a philosopher can be so zany. The fact that scientific data to prove God's existence is" The reaction has been expressed. His father is the priest despite the 15 years since the self-atheist as the Antony Flew, "People of my previous ideas of my influences thinking, we reason that these big damage compensation to be working" The apology diledi.Dünya wide repercussions provocative statement Flew, a new scientific discovery of the universe's creation on the back of said the show could be a divine presence, the theory of evolution itself Danvin'in mentioned was not satisfied. A substance derived from the lackluster first live does not mean that the professor may, however, is not a Christian, also said Hıristiyanlık'la to join the Islam faith in God.
There are 23 books
Proof of God's existence is impossible to believe or to be a lie itself "negative atheist" as a defining Flew, Oxford, Keele University in Aberdeen and was given training. Professor, is currently one of 23 books "God and Philosophy" section of the entrance of his work, his ideas according to a new deal is changing. (Vatan-Milliyet: 13/12/2004)

  I was atheist for 30 years no longer believe in God


People in the history of science to solve the DNA code that Francis Collins, "God's presence felt while working in laboratories," he said
As one of the world's largest genetic experts and eight years ago the human DNA with colleagues Craig Venter'le decrypt the great reputation catch Dr. Francis Collins, "came to believe." Venter, the scientific world has brought a huge volume of work in progress, followed by the laboratory in the "artificially alive" when trying to produce, Collins is the new book, between science and religion to create a new discussion looks like. September will be released in "God's language" his book about the British The Times newspaper, speaking to the 56-year-old Collins, 30 years ago but is now atheist believe in God by saying, "God's got to be there is a basis for rational and scientific justify further development of man to God, "he said. American scientists now believe in miracles and angels, by specifying that, "I felt God working in the laboratory. Certainly there is a power greater than us and I believe him. To solve the DNA's code a little more close to God made me. The people saw the disease broke. Science despair had them. But back to life as they saw the miraculous. This is God's work, "he spoke. To solve the human gene also gives them the opportunity to see God's work that Collins said, "When you meet an important scientific enthusiasm that you'll enjoy the moment, because they have discovered and investigated. Explore what it was something that, no humans have already had this information. But I always knew God, "he said.
Genetic code of the human body to go down in history were decrypt the DNA of two scientists, these studies and the history of science history would be. Be solved by DNA and codes of the period of the arrangement of U.S. President Bill Clinton and British Prime Minister Tony Blair announced to the world was simultaneously descriptions. (Vatan: 08.04.2008)
Patrick Glyn: "I was an Atheist!"
We know you're experiencing a significant transformation. When and how atheism is an illusion you have noticed? Maybe before, I have to tell you how to be atheist. I was trained in religious Catholic family. I would join the church choir on Sundays. But in my youth, I began to change in the 60s, the year he transferred to Harvard's typical agnostic model was adopted. With Strauss, the implicit acceptance of atheism did. This was based Darwinizm'i atheism more. Atheism after Darwin, is already being questioned in many Western intellectuals became an accepted standard.
However, this picture started to change the 80's. I've found among many intellectuals, to take over the subject of atheism was questioned. On the other hand, was a change in the American culture. Today, Americans are still very strong among the secular elite has a wing. But their opinion, ideology has become one of the only formerly, for example the question 60'larda or opinions 70'lerin truth as he saw Ta. If Harvard is going to church to read and were on the market, seen as a bit strange someone a little old fashion, as one of the old remained. At this table today has changed greatly between the American intellectuals can also see a strong religiosity. He defended the existence of great physicists such as Polkinghorne, and this very convincing way and do ma'kul.
You also mentioned your book and convincing evidence of this ma'kul Could you briefly talk about? 20. At the beginning of the century, Big-Bang (Big Bang) theory is accepted, and this theory, alemi a beginning, that moment of creation is demonstrated. This infinite universe is the materialist view that the defense was a major coup. The physicist of the 1970s, was aware of a matter interesting and engrossing. Balance of the whole physical universe, for example, or atom hold together yerçekiminin of the nuclear forces, it can have the ideal values to create a alemi were found. "Antropik Principles" (People for the understanding of universe) is called in this amazing, we live in a universe does not occur randomly, especially for human life, the idea of creating a large evidence oluşturdu. Over the years, new evidence that supports this principle also is continuing to emerge.
In biology, do you have evidence showing the existence of a creation?
Of course you do! Today when you look at the biological world, the idea of approaching the creation of a paradigm change, you can see. Biology of the 19th century paradigm shaped, that is being shaken to the basic admission. In this paradigm for the largest share Darwinizm'i. This theory, all life on earth claiming to be senseless nature of work had hâdiselerinin. However, the details of vitality are discovered, but the perfect, accurate, and the system is based on an intensive program. This system is a product of coincidence, and the reason gâyesiz increasingly unacceptable case that comes to mind.
Not just Darwin, Freud is also a jerk I guess?
Absolutely! Freud, a materialist explanation of human psychology, tried to bring. Moreover, religious belief is a kind of neurosis has argued, people are atheist, but said they could have a healthy psychology. But evidence shows that the exact converse. Psychological research, psychological aspects of religious people are healthier than full of data. Freud, religion will disappear with the modernization is estimated in the way, has completely come to naught.
The existence of the soul after death and about in your book about the life experiences are drawn from the evidence, did you not?
Yes! In fact, the process allows me to abandon my atheism, actually started to review the evidence on this issue, I would say. Early'90s, a long holiday period, the death experience of the people on the shore of the reports I've reviewed. Most of them, standing heart during surgery, a few minutes really living biological death, but later returned to life people. Told about the short time the face of death, there are great similarities. Almost all of the spirit is separated from the body, says they had seen from outside. Product is impossible to tell they fancy because it is in the room What, doc to do to save themselves describe in detail about them and can not be seen with the eyes. The book describes in detail all the evidence that the human has a spirit, showing a significant data. We have a soul, the basis is the foundation of atheism materialist philosophy is denied.
21. century, how do you look? Where this leads will carry the idea of humanity?
20. century, which dominated a large part of the lost sekülarizm no longer valid. Was thought to be an objective reality of Sekülarizm now he only came to the different world views of the case and the ground is also increasingly er. 21. century, 20 century will be more religious. But the question is this: a peaceful and tolerant understanding of religion, or a religious conflict to increase the understanding you? Surely every right-minded people, the first one is language. (Sızıntı-Nisan/2005
Memories of alleged evolution took place
Human chromosome 2 that investigated Evan Eiche, human DNA change, as I long to spread rather than by sudden and dramatic change occurred with the savunuyor.Buna, the radical changes within a short time and is fast, following a long period only minor changes to occur. This thesis, as I think of evolution as progressive in a long time, but was very sudden jump in the way. The stage of the process of evolution, chromosomes can be read from the DNA series. Changes in the chromosomal DNA part of the copy or copies of DNA can be detected ....
RANGE 20 to 10 MILLION YEARS
Evolution on 10 to 20 million years ago the most important activity fork must have experienced. Human, chimpanzee, orangutan and gorilla, including the ape family of the 10 million annual range were separated from other types of primitive ape. 10 million years of evolution for a very short period of time. On the other hand, people in the other monkey species and then was held to separate.
ONLY 2 chromosome has been
Science team, 2 in chromosome number caused by DNA changes that occur with short intervals that can not currently explain. (YOK KI, KI ACIKLAYABILSINLER not BE SUBJECT - EREN KUTLU-...!?) However, this study question the thesis of evolution has occurred gradually and balanced. Even in the evolution process of genetic evolution of this bounce in the brain is thought to be effective also. (Milliyet: 21 June 2005)
SOON EVRIMCILERDE, ALLAH IS A request Back to the time you want "IN" DER DA OLUR that will ACCEPT AYETINI just enough life to let MI LOOK ...!?
DNA, the evidence of God and Atheist İman --
British newspaper The Sunday Times "Genomics Solving Adam, I found God Diyor" Francis Collins mentioned the news
                                       
Francis Collins, the results described in 2001 the famous Human Genome Project conducted for the U.S. National Human Genome Research Institute's president. This institute officials at the highest level of scientist Gene Myers, who in 2001 made a comment in the DNA "has a tremendous knowledge that" and this knowledge base to "designed" is to say that you think, this explanation to the media "of scientists and creative in DNA sees as "was reflected in the title. Now, Francis Collins says the same thing.
Just do not say, write a book on this subject is, according to The Sunday Times news. The Language of God (God's language) of his book, published in September next. Explaining that the DNA to examine the science-religion conflict to support one side toward cliche, "to see God's work" has given Collins'e. Perspective is summarized as follows:
"Scientific discovery is done, it resembles the name of science exciting, because for a long time and finally found it should have between. But at the same time I've felt a closeness to the Creative resembles this, because so far, but only God knows, people do not know any of the understand a thing you feel. "
Collins, DNA genetic information in the following comments made about:
"Human rights all the information and secrets that carry the 3.1 billion letters in the book of instructions that leave you when the review sheet that you begin feeling of admiration in the stick is not available. A look at this page when they me about God's mind is given a hint to think I can not get my own."
Some readers, Collins'in these descriptions, "religious people look on religion is everything, so such comments are subjective," he may scoff. But do not stop it no Collins'in story. Famous scientist, an atheist as ever lived to the age of 27. From atheism to abandon the process, thanks to some patients religion gained great spiritual power that has started to notice it ... Display, Collins, viewing nature as God's presence brought more conviction; DNA found in the "muzzam information" on this issue agreed that the final was as persuasive.
In short, starting from the reality of faith is not to describe - think of the atheist and the devout will claim - out of reality and have faith.
At this point it can be said that, since reality will bring people to know Allah, why many people still atheist realist?
Answer, "atheist faith" or confidential. In these days I would stop by frequently to bookstores in America, "bestseller" list conservative author Ann Coulter'ın Godless: The Church of Liberalism is located at the top of his book. Coulter, in this book, "liberalism" in - it to English "sekülerizm" can be translated as, liberal word and in America means we are different - in itself a religion and that members believe that it describes as sectarian. In the center of this religion seküleristlerin "creation story" is the Darwinizm. Coulter, a belief in Darwinist theory of how much darker, depending on what gives many examples.
Another recently published in America before the work is remarkable, Australian philosopher David Stove'un Darwinian Fairytales (Darwinist Masallar) of his book. Stove, not a creation of "intelligent design" or not. Only in an objective manner, and this theory is criticized Darwinizm'i and species origin of life that many of the times "tale" does not go further than is shown in a very striking.
In short, atheism and its support for "scientific" theories, and the fact that faith and belief is based on a rather dark. Faith, doubt theism (Allah to accept) for the required. But the belief of the dose required for atheism, theism need for much more than that. Norman L. I Do not Have Enough Faith to Be an Atheist Geisler'ın (None Atheist Becoming enough my belief), as described in the book, the important ...
Science, to prove God's existence
The world's most important genes that are recognized as expert Dr former atheist. Francis Collins, "Genetic structure perfection of God's work can be just. Progress of science to prove God's existence will allow. Make people conscious of the gene becomes active in only a miracle''he said will prove
Shown as the most important news of the U.S. magazines Time, Newsweek and Wired, this week's issue has divided the religion issue. Time, "Science and religion marked rasındaki century of struggle to 2''specifying, Newsweek" will increase the power of religion on politics. In many Western countries to the table again yatıralacak secularism''comments made. Strengthening of the religious currents of the new atheism wired motion and generate a serious conflict between believing and not believing in the will said.
RESEARCH HAS
Religion on the discussion about news file yaratcak published in Time magazine. Famous atheist Richard Dawkins Time'a speaking, the defense theory of evolution as "scientific progress, human body, even the identification of genes that have shown their feelings and behavior. Genetic structure has changed in our process and ultimately billions annually modern humans emerged by chance''he said. Response to the world's most important gene Dawkins'in claim as one of the experts indicated Dr. Francis came Collins'ten. A former atheist who Dr. Collins, since 1993 director for Human Genome Research Institute'un do. Dr. 3 billion people in 2400 in a pioneering Collins'in a team consisting of people from my arrangement of the genetic structure was solved. Dr. Collins, Time'a in that, to prove God's existence as a scientific research was started by specifying said: Evolution of the genetic structure of the defense of the people worried about the same percentage 99'unun keeps monkeys. However, mice with different types and hundreds at a rate of 90 percent the same genetic structure and genetic arrangement paylaşıyoruz.DNA I've made hundreds of research on the "Why people believe in God?''Could not find the answer to the question. Us to believe it to God in our genetic structure Mükkemel the biological structure of the gene called bulunmuyor.VMAT2 appeared to be more confident. This "God gene''was named. This gene is not active, the expression was skeptical. But until now, we do make an active research VMAT2'nin factor did not find the external. What the changes in the environment, nor the effect on VMAT2 is hereditary reasons. Become active in a miraculous way of God, genes and people of faith we believe olgusunun occurred. I mean, but God's request to move is the belief gene. VMAT2'nin will solve the mystery. Thus, the first time the existence of God will be proven as scientific. (Milliyet: 07 November 2006)

ARTIK O DA Evolution and not DEFENSE!
It's time to rescue science from atheism
... Mr. Alkan, "I've done so far, the damage to their own prejudices and beliefs of the target board into a Theory of Evolution was to criticize people." he says .. OK, fine. But precisely at this point, you make a mistake düşünüyorum.Sorun, Mr Alkan, some in Turkey "Enlightenment" items, such as the return to the Evolution Theory to every criticism "prejudices and beliefs damage offs" in a non-science to think the response. This theory of the accuracy of the rough to have accepted and are to the theory of criticism, is the scientific evidence without looking, "religious reaction" sayıyorlar.İşte, Mr Alkan's recent article "Evolution Theory of the target board become the" talk to this one example. Yet I, the theory of "Let the target board into a" let's blame, not saying. Instead, "Come let's discuss it" I said. Türker Alkan of course may be outside of the debate, says it already, but one of the debates by the scientific, the other positive count is incorrect.
Science and atheism
Mr Alkan, while criticizing me, "Evolution of the Theory of the atheist, but was assumed to believe" was put forward. However, I did not write such a thing. Indeed, the evolution of the interpretation of the faith to make a compatible working "Teistik Evrimciler" I know in existence. However, Alkan's still acceptable, as there is close relationship between Darwinism and atheism. I proudly refer to themselves Darwinist. As one of today's most famous evolutionist in the Oxford University zoology professor Richard Dawkins, "Darwin is missing from us in the direction of intellectual atheist to be completed given the chance." der. Again dark evrimci Daniel Dennett'in "Darwin's Dangerous Idea" is based on his book, Darwinism, "all religious belief eriten universal acid" tir. Of course the atheist may be requested. You may argue, may try to spread too. The problem is, science should be seated at the defense of the atheist is a basis. I guess the most from this direction, Mr Alkan do I need to criticize. Dated 11 July 2003 column, because "science, as a thinking activity already 'of atheism' is difficult to say there." I had written. Whereas science accepts the existence of God yüzyılllar boyu do. Modern science Keppler, Galileo, Newton, none of the founders, such as Cuvier was not atheist, but to the universe "created by God to discover the nature and the law" were considered. This tradition is changing science, 19 century are some materialist theories. At the beginning of this process in reverse gelir.Bugün Darwinism and materialist theories that are rapidly losing blood. This is overwhelmed with daily discussions "Our agenda" in a very large scientific revolution could not be any difference. My goal, to draw attention to it and ignored by them is still "science must be atheistic" to show incorrect to say.
"Who designed the designer?"
Mr Alkan spelling of the word is that the Intelligent Design (Intelligent Design) theory by pointing to it as follows: "Every design, in the presence of a designer shows are called. Maybe. But if we move from this idea, 'Who designed the designer?" We will respond to the questions What? " However, this is not a coherent objection. We, as a scientific, but the testing and observation to investigate the origin of the universe material can be subjected. This is the universe has a designer, which I think, which is the size of an entity and that we do not know any of the designer, there is no beginning. (Indeed, I think it is.) Let me explain this with an example: in a cave wall, we elaborated on motifs, "was painted from them?" By asking a resssamın presence çıkarsayabiliriz. But I can not see any of these artists, "he who has been painting?" would be wrong to ask. Ressam, a drawing is not, however, are painted. " He is in a different plane and how the question is there, the only way our data can not answer them ..
Science and positive thinking
Mustafa Akyol, radical writer with Türker Alkan its' science and atheism 'is to continue discussions. Akyol, 'Science, atheism or another have to assume it is not dogma' says
... Of our discussion with Mr Alkan essence, the method of science. She, 'Science is obliged to assume that atheism is' he says. I have to assume that the philosophy of science is not any, I would argue should be free from all dogma ...
Is it God's presence with science?
... 'Discussions about God's existence' in science. I debate about his qualifications and AIM is outside of science, religion and philosophy will try to explain it was interested. This distinction, let me explain again by resorting to the example before writing a motifs elaborated on the cave wall, we draw them çıkarsayabiliriz a resssamın presence. But I can not see any of those artists, who are, what you think, what is intended to only 'can not remove material from the case. The design of the universe with the same logic, the existence of a creative çıkarsayabiliriz. But he's creative nature, are beyond the fields of science.