Universe and all living kainattaki coincidence of natural selection (extraction) and put forward the view that evolution is generated grows. The developers have developed follows the evolution of Darwin:
Of amino acids have been created here is how the proteins come together to form the primitive single-celled canlıları will bring about. Then trilopitleri this life, they are combined with fish, fish development, and they amfibiyenleri Jurassic, Jurassic birds, mammals and birds were brought up evolution grows. So all living creatures from a single live evolution grows, was formed by chance. Darwin, not just the people came from monkeys, all live in a live unicellular argued that evolution will occur.
Now let us answer it in order:
A self-amino acids may occur in primitive conditions did you? First, these questions can be asked. How the constituent elements, amino acids were formed ...
Stanley Miller in 1953 will make an experiment. Conditions may occur in a primitive experiments proved that amino acids advocates. But when the experiment reveals some tricks to apply to:
Methane and ammonia gas used in the experiments, unlike the 1970s, Miller's experiments in the primitive environment of the gas that has emerged. Researchers in the atmosphere of the first period, nitrogen, hydrogen, water vapor, oxygen and carbon dioxide have proof of that. This single amino acids, even in gas with 1975'teki experiments could not be obtained.
Miller, testing the "cold trap" is a mechanism used. This mechanism prevents the formation of oxygen and amino acids from the Miller experiment in abstraction-foreigner solutions of protectionism.
Miller as a result of the experiment, live and organic acids was formed invasive structures. Miller has isolated this acid from the experiments. In short, the Miller experiment, prove evolution is not evolution. Because a try even for amino acids to the formation of methane and ammonia gas not to be added, the oxygen must be removed, protected amino acids that work to create a special mechanism (cold trap) should be established and the disruptive features of organic acids should be isolated. In short, amino acids and not by chance in the special conditions, control, a laboratory environment, but with conscious interventions can be achieved Miller has proof.
Already Miller of the above contrast, the 1985 symposium in the Swedish city of Stockholm, also Science (S.423) 'te, The Origins Of Life On The Earth (S.33)' te has confessed.
Is it self-proteins may occur in the ocean? Describe a sampling-Yalım: The small protein, 500 amino acids, a protein molecule mesala properly capture probability dizilimi 10,950 respectively. Mathematics in 1050 from zero according to the law adopted after the possibility for the formation of such a protein molecule in the probability is zero. Also "Le Chatelier" according to law; proteins during the formation of the water out, water out of the reaction can also occur in the water is impossible.
Of a DNA molecule, proteinoidlerin merger may occur by chance did you? Structure of DNA millions of password host one of the smallest likely to occur 10600'tür. Also proteinoid, protein or DNA formed the opinion does not now claim any evrimci.
Fish amfibiyene time (and can live on land and at sea to live) that can Did you? Is this evidence is? Are examples of this transitional period-Eusthenopteron'ların mine were put forward. But this fish, is not a difference from others in evrimci today to confess.
Is it Amfibiyenler can turn into reptiles? Crawl-gen at the time of his live Seymouria that is claimed. But the research, 50 million of these live in the reptile had lived years ago has proven that. Also, the stamps will not be alive. But all of the skin of all reptiles are covered with stamps.
Is that reptiles can turn into mammals? Is it time to turn into birds and mammals reptiles? Between the structure of the jaw in reptiles and mammals, except for differences in ear oviparous, scaly, cold-blooded born of a growing vibrant, velvety how warm-blooded mammals return to the coincidence of the de evrimci questions are answered.
Human evolution varolmuştur Is it increasing? Now people from evrimcilerin to monkey with the order during the evolutionary phases Let's see:
Upright on two feet Australopithecus'ın start walking, the first monkey that claims of five specialists in the team headed by Lord Zuckerman, 15-year study of the end of a monkey species that live in and that they do not walk upright conclude were the answer.
Homo habilis: a skeleton found in 1984, this type of monkeys that the small brain volume, with long arms, short legs you have demonstrated. Anthropologist Holly Smith, Fred Spoor, B. Wood, Frans always Zonneveld'te research results have the same results. Homo habilis is a monkey, ape skeletons have.
Homo Rudolfensis: Human face anatomy professor Tim Bromage, Cl Brace, paleantropolok Prof. Alan Walker for their review of this glass face, teeth, brain volume ... have concluded that a monkey.
Homo erectus: Studies of modern human skeleton with no difference between Homo erectus'un skeleton has not. H. erectus is a human, monkey is not a similarity. H. Pygmy with a small volume of erectus skull, thick eyebrows with protrusion of indigenous Australia is still a live today. The difference between Homo erectus and us, with Negroes, but as the difference between the results of eskimo both in person.
Interesting side of the business, first yaşamış Australopithecus'lar their evolution homo habilis, then they claim that evolution is became homo eructusa, indicating that all three live in a race to find the documents. In fact, Homo rudolfensis'in, allegedly at the time a million years older than is homo habilisten Homo rudolfensis ...
Neandertallar: who buried their dead, made and played musical instruments, intelligence levels, talk with the only difference from today's people have a skeleton is a bit stronger. Therefore, they are people ...
Now, the researchers argue evolution itself and the evolution of evrimci magazine about the confession, let us examine the evolution of order:
Bad to Jeffrey: "The biggest problem: how life began on earth?".
Russian evrimci AlOparini "Cell nascency of the theory of evolution is the point of the dark".
Evrimci Earth magazine: "Today Miller's scenario is met with suspicion."
Evrimci W. Ager: "I have encountered the same thing. Kademeli developed through evolution, not all of a sudden we see groups created on the earth."
Evrimci Barbara J. Stahl: "none of the known fish species, living on land at the time as the four-pillar can not be determined."
Evrimci Lewis L. Carroll: "Unfortunately, before the emergence of reptiles in the reptile at the only time there is no example."
Evrimci Roger Lewin: "How the first mammal to be an evolutionary transition, is still a big secret."
Century of the greatest theoreticians evrimci Gaylond George Simpson: "The lives of the most confusing thing in the world, the era of reptiles to mammals cycle is suddenly changed ..."
Evrimci Mark Ridley: "No real evolutionist, fossil records as evidence supporting the idea of creation can not use."
Celebrity evrimci, bird scientist, Alan Feduccia: "The birds, the common ancestors have lived years ago, tens of thousands of dinosaur-machines, and therefore does not have relevance with the dinosaurs ..."
Stanley Miller: "Methane, nitrogen, and not a small amount of water vapor in the mixture of ammonia, for the primitive world is a more realistic atmosphere."
Another Haeckel'den evrimci phony confession: I did this myself reprove and condemn the fraud after the confession of the need to see. But my consolation is that I, found guilty in the hundreds of friends, many reliable observers, and biologists have known that they removed the best biology books, theses, in magazines and I made my very phony-lıklar, much less has been described, re-edited, was şematize shapes is located. "
Evrimci biggest problem of the evolution of life from each other it does not find an example of exploring the smallest of the change. For example, monkeys have been derived from human monkey after the start of change, but people come to the stage before that, the search term (which takes millions of years) in the human-ape mixture, half-human, half-ape, ruins, fossil skeleton should have. The alleged fraud of evrimci product or pig bones or teeth, or the remains of extinct Orangudan emerged. So it remains, the bones can not find why? Because such a transition, from a single live evolution, and diversification, there is no replication. Every soul single individual has been created.
Do Evrimciler are narrow-minded? The following sentence belongs to a Turkish evrimci:
Not found any fossils of this evolution theory does not collapse.
Assuming we still did not find any fossils. This all calls for vibrant, mixed with nature shows.
Let's say you fall out of all fossil! This does not collapse even in the evolution theory.
... (Perhaps evolution) is not possible with current information, but up to 100 years in this regard will be rolled giant steps are considered final ...(!)
Note: Darwin, the letter written to a friend for the Turks "You race, barbaric, society will be destroyed," he is talking about (The Life and Letters of Charles Darwin, New York, 1.Cilt, Page: 266)
In short summary, the evolution, a theory as unproven and have been discarded outside the boundaries of bilimsellik, but by narrow-minded fanatics "a non-scientific belief" was made, is a religion superstitious. All superstitious as religion in the evolution of miat filled.
"Came to us, is not superstitious. No doubt it is doomed to be not superstitious. (İsra: 81)"
NOTE: FINAL DEVELOPMENT: THE FIRST WORLD OF microorganisms can not claim to Darwinist DE FIRST LIVE NOW the "Space in the Building, then began to claim the world is coming to! CLAIM Monkeys instead of the "field mouse" was declared as the new ATA. . . ! ! !

"The keyboard's keys per second with a time of pressing common future, one time only" evolutionary hypothesis "about 317 billion years to write will need to deal ..." says Prof. Dr. Until now Arif steady anti-evolution works in reverse bilimsellik discuss the evolution of scientific data dayatma by questioning the accuracy of science in spite of the evolution of defense teroisinin is dayatma marks are belief yobazca. "If evolution is a faith and believed him and the words have no credibility, but we have respect for those in question is a scientific theory, then in the light of scientific data, this theory is the undisputed scientific facts that have to be discussed in dayatma" said the Prof.. Dr. Read as a lesson about Sars Arif scientists have to be a work made specifically for recording. August 27, 2008
RADICAL ANSWER to
İsmet Berkan: 26 June 2005 The main difference between scientific theories born with. " Science and faith in this article before Berkan, I still have the experience to bring to the theory of evolution, "... Charles Darwin, Evolution Theory can come to is at the middle was also estimated. Theory, a very short time 'religion blasphemy' as detected in the UK and Western Europe. Darwin's theory was a dynamic model. Type a new perspective about the development was at the middle. Today this is still our best point of view. Emergence of species, development or from the attempt to put the theory of Darwin is still with today are explained. Nice in theory than a lot of the time subject to change, but still did not change the essence of business, more exactly, the job will change the essence of scientific evidence did not put in place (...!?). The main difference between scientific theory and it is a dogma. Scientific theory, is a dynamic model. Each day will be tested again, if the change is wrong is right, "he says, and a number of examples allegedly trying to argue that Darwin's scientific theory and dynamic theory says, and until that time it yanlışlayacak produce a new theory put forward by, those who believe in creation, the" creation tales "in the face by using the phrase goes to the waves.
The best response to this attitude of radical comment on the Times newspaper published scientific article was signed by Mustafa Akyol. Mustafa Akyol in this article, Darwinizm'in the contemporary appeal of the "religion-based", not "science-based" and that many scientists today believe in Darwin's thesis was not remarkable. Resources to support scientific article Akyol has included the following statement: "many people in Turkey to address the subject in the mind" as a scientific theory reactive religious and sectarian "table is available. However, cases not so simple. First, most of the opponents of Darwin who "of religion" when you see, Darwin fans from most of "the religious opposition" to see the need.
Darwin, religion has not made a comment about how, for example, "There is no God," he did not, but the theory makes it possible to say from day one of the atheist was enthroned. Because of today's leading evrimci by Oxford zoologist Richard Dawkins'in, Darwin atheist to "fully consistent with the intellectual aspect provided a chance to be atheist". So "tarafgirlik", are on both sides. ... Fact is important, Darwinizm'in the contemporary appeal of the "religion-based", not "science-based" is created. Of course, some people, "I am against Darwinizm'i because contrary to my beliefs," he says, but today that is discussed in the scientific world, this is not. Discussed, Darwinizm'in of scientific dilemmas. How was the first cell have? Live body emerged in how complex biochemical machines? What is the origin of genetic information? Why all the basic known animal groups (phylum of) the same geological period (the era Kambriyen) suddenly, without assigning them to similar outputs? Satisfactory answers to questions like this can give no Darwinist. And interesting side business, science progresses Darwinizm'in answers, not questions, more exactly, the problem is increasing. Darwinist "science course will help you find answers to them" They say, but in this case the theory is not evidence in hand for the future in an inevitable (ie, belief) is based on becoming ...
So it can not explain the origin of life Darwinizm, how to explain it need? In the United States in recent years developing "Intelligent Design" (Intelligent Design) theory, the answer to that question brings. Darwinizm, vitality of the nature of the works of the law and interpreted as the coincidence that this theory is more forward, a third factor: Design! Design theory, "yaratılış assertion" is not. Because the design of scientific evidence, Yaratılış assertion is based on the religious sources. Design of the rest, Kitab-ı Mukaddes or it is not live in the complex systems. See the top of Mount Nemrut statues, their "natural effects" are created, how do we know has been designed, we understand the vitality of the design so we are. (Of course, this reasoning to have a specific methodology, Baylor University mathematician Prof.. Founded by William Dembski. [1]) "Live and Who designed it?" Questions, but science can give no answer. However, according to people of faith and philosophy can provide personal responses, but those outside the field of science. Therefore, Design theory, according to religion, but a non-religious in the United States increasingly düşünce.Ve this theory is strengthened. Theory of the scientific center of the case were released by the Discovery Insitute "Darwinizm'i View questionable" number of scientists who signed the Declaration has exceeded 400. Georgia, New Mexico, in states like Ohio, Design theory, some of the arguments, Darwinizm'in entry as an alternative to textbooks. In the next week will become Kansas'taki case. In Turkey, all these scientific opposition to the Darwinist "dincilik" I scoff, and then explain Darwinizm'in in fact everything is rolling thunder is an advanced version. For example, Prof.. Ertan, "human genome project" for the evolution of the information revealed is very strong in claiming. However, no such project has not provided such a result. Instead, it can be said that the vitality of the complexes reveal a little more relevance, Design thesis was to provide support. Carrying out the project scientist of the company Celera genomics Gene Myers'ın these words, find an echo in the media was quite "surprised me the life of the architecture. Extraordinary degree of complex systems. Designed like. "[2]
This s an article until this issue is not enough to discuss the scientific evidence, of course. But right here that, with everyone Darwinizm'i defense, ready to debate in every place and every condition I would be very good. Here, as a matter of fact we should say something about the self. I already said that in fact Mr Berkan. Not get to participate in the following statement: "Science is the basis of skepticism, religion and faith. There is no hint in the place of science. "
Very true. However, the concept of faith here, as Teistik religions believe, believe in atheism and materialism also need to understand. Some of Darwinizm'i defense insists that the "izm" s look like doing so because of faith because the evidence is discussed, instead of trying to appeal the disqualification. Design theory of defense scientists call the much more objective: "Come let us follow the proof, let us take what results they bring ..."
WITHDRAWAL RIGHT PLACE began to Darwinizm çıktığı ... And now the world can not be fooled!
1. With the evolution of proteins may occur Darwinizm now can not claim. Because even a single protein to occur by chance probability theory as the correct arrangement 10950'de me is 1. This is mathematically impossible to realize is a possibility.
2. Darwinizm as evidence to show the evolution of the fossil can not. Because, 19 century around the world since the middle of the archaeological work, the evolutionist claim that the millions of "transitional form between the" fossil found in even a single one. "Loss of the public" was understood to be a myth out of science.
3. So far found Evrimciler numerous fossils have been helpless in the face. Because of the creation of all fossils support, is proof that nature.

4. Box is now at Archæopteryx'in evrimci birds can not claim. Because recent studies on fossil Archæopteryx that live in the "half-bird" that has refuted the allegations. Anatomy and brain structure necessary for flight Archæ-opteryx'in the bird is perfectly understandable that as the host, and thus "the tale of the evolution of birds" can not be defended for evrimci olmuştur.
5. Darwinizm the "Horse Series," he confessed to not use my fake arrays. Because of this false history series in a different era, and has lived independently in different geographies, were found to consist of live species.
6. Darwinizm story is now out for the water to land can not use fossil Coelecanth named. Extinct because claimed to be one-form of the live experience is still a bottom-fish that has emerged so far, more than 200 live and as live-in number is captured.
7. Darwinizm, Ramapithecus, Australopithecus Series (A. Bose, A. Robustus, A. Aferensis, Africanus, etc..), Such as the appointment of people to live their claims can not be defended now. Because the research on these fossils, their people are not interested in any and all had lived in the past have put more of the monkey species.
8. Darwinizm Rekonstrüksiyon (animation) with drawings of the human blood. Because the remains of animals, based on past yaşamış of this animation (reconstruction) do not have any scientific value and are totally unreliable by scientists to have been obvious.
9. Darwinizm the "Piltdown Man" of evolution can not be shown as to the evidence. Because research "Piltdown Man" he is not got no time for a fossil human skull belonging to an orangutan jaw attached to the blood during 40 years of being human is revealed.
10. Darwinizm "Nebraska Man" of the family, and alleged that the defense can not prove evolution. Because the "Nebraska Man" was based on the story of the few dental remains of a wild boar in fact extinct has been found to belong to.
11. Darwinizm the "Natural Selection can not defend the claim that the cause evolution. Because the mechanisms of the evolution live, giving them new features have been proven by scientific.